Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-03 10:31:04) > > On 01/02/2021 12:07, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-01 11:57:56) > >> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Slight improvement with regards to wrapping header components to fit > >> console width. If a single element is wider than max it can still > >> overflow but it should now work better for practical console widths. > > > > <---- > > intel-gpu-top: Intel Kabylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0 > > 900/ 949 MHz; 0% RC6; 6.97/18.42 W; 2 irqs/s > > IMC reads: 6 MiB/s > > IMC writes: 0 MiB/s > > > > ----> > > intel-gpu-top: Intel Kabylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0 - 903/ 954 MHz; 0% RC6 > > 7.16/18.40 W; 14 irqs/s > > > > IMC reads: 80 MiB/s > > IMC writes: 0 MiB/s > > > > I thought it looked reasonably tidy, without adding any lines to the > > header. > > Or on a wider terminal: > <---- > intel-gpu-top: Intel Skylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0 > 0/ 0 MHz; 100% RC6; 0.00/ 1.29 W; 0 irqs/s > IMC reads: 138 MiB/s > IMC writes: 6 MiB/s > ---> > intel-gpu-top: Intel Skylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0 - 0/ 0 MHz; 100% RC6; 0.00/ 0.00 W; 0 irqs/s > > IMC reads: 77 MiB/s > IMC writes: 4 MiB/s > > > So a "fight" between 80 chars vs 120 (or so). :) It may be a bit of an over-engineered solution but I don't like the wrap on a wide terminal, plus I like an extra blank line. But the memory counters are visually similar to the frequency/rc6/power/interrupts... -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
