Re: [PATCH i-g-t] intel_gpu_top: Wrap interactive header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 01/02/2021 12:07, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2021-02-01 11:57:56)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>

Slight improvement with regards to wrapping header components to fit
console width. If a single element is wider than max it can still
overflow but it should now work better for practical console widths.

<----
intel-gpu-top: Intel Kabylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0
  900/ 949 MHz;   0% RC6;  6.97/18.42 W;        2 irqs/s
       IMC reads:        6 MiB/s
      IMC writes:        0 MiB/s

---->
intel-gpu-top: Intel Kabylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0 -  903/ 954 MHz;   0% RC6
     7.16/18.40 W;       14 irqs/s

       IMC reads:       80 MiB/s
      IMC writes:        0 MiB/s

I thought it looked reasonably tidy, without adding any lines to the
header.

Or on a wider terminal:
<----
intel-gpu-top: Intel Skylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0
   0/   0 MHz; 100% RC6;  0.00/ 1.29 W;        0 irqs/s
      IMC reads:      138 MiB/s
     IMC writes:        6 MiB/s
--->
intel-gpu-top: Intel Skylake (Gen9) @ /dev/dri/card0 -    0/   0 MHz; 100% RC6;  0.00/ 0.00 W;        0 irqs/s

      IMC reads:       77 MiB/s
     IMC writes:        4 MiB/s


So a "fight" between 80 chars vs 120 (or so). :) It may be a bit of an over-engineered solution but I don't like the wrap on a wide terminal, plus I like an extra blank line.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux