On Tue, 29 Dec 2020, Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2020-12-22 at 20:19:49 +0530, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Follow the usual naming pattern for functions. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 2 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 2 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h | 2 +- >> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c >> index 334ba1775cd3..65406d4ccdbe 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c >> @@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_xfer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, >> */ >> cpu_latency_qos_update_request(&i915->pm_qos, 0); >> >> - intel_dp_check_edp(intel_dp); >> + intel_pps_check_power_unlocked(intel_dp); >> >> /* Try to wait for any previous AUX channel activity */ >> for (try = 0; try < 3; try++) { >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c >> index 3e62d1450682..dfd6722bc40e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c >> @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static bool edp_have_panel_vdd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) >> return intel_de_read(dev_priv, _pp_ctrl_reg(intel_dp)) & EDP_FORCE_VDD; >> } >> >> -void intel_dp_check_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) >> +void intel_pps_check_power_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > IMHO comment to take pps_lock would be useful here. Part of the point of this change is to name it _unlocked to highlight it does not take the lock, i.e. you should be aware of locking. You see this pattern all over the kernel. It's self-documenting code. Moreover, after the edp check, the calls here have: lockdep_assert_held(&dev_priv->pps_mutex); which both documents the requirement as well as ensures the proper usage in lockdep builds. I don't think a comment adds any value. BR, Jani. > Thanks, > Anshuman. >> { >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp); >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h >> index 4780b59a59df..8dda282abd42 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h >> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ intel_wakeref_t intel_pps_unlock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, intel_wakeref_t wake >> #define with_intel_pps_lock(dp, wf) \ >> for ((wf) = intel_pps_lock(dp); (wf); (wf) = intel_pps_unlock((dp), (wf))) >> >> -void intel_dp_check_edp(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); >> void intel_pps_backlight_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); >> void intel_pps_backlight_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); >> void intel_pps_backlight_power(struct intel_connector *connector, bool enable); >> @@ -31,6 +30,7 @@ bool intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); >> void intel_pps_vdd_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync); >> void intel_pps_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); >> void intel_pps_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); >> +void intel_pps_check_power_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); >> >> void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); >> void intel_pps_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp); >> -- >> 2.20.1 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-gfx mailing list >> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx