On 2020-12-22 at 20:19:45 +0530, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Follow the usual naming pattern for functions, both for the prefix and
> the _unlocked suffix for functions that expect the lock to be held when
IMHO referring * pps lock * would be good in commit log.
Thanks,
Anshuman.
> calling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 16 +++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c | 26 ++++++++++++------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h | 10 ++++-----
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 2052ee228077..f2794cc4292a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1038,7 +1038,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_xfer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> * to turn it off. But for eg. i2c-dev access we need to turn it on/off
> * ourselves.
> */
> - vdd = edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> + vdd = intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked(intel_dp);
>
> /* dp aux is extremely sensitive to irq latency, hence request the
> * lowest possible wakeup latency and so prevent the cpu from going into
> @@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_xfer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> cpu_latency_qos_update_request(&i915->pm_qos, PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
>
> if (vdd)
> - edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, false);
> + intel_pps_vdd_off_unlocked(intel_dp, false);
>
> intel_pps_unlock(intel_dp, pps_wakeref);
> intel_display_power_put_async(i915, aux_domain, aux_wakeref);
> @@ -3159,9 +3159,9 @@ static void intel_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>
> intel_dp_enable_port(intel_dp, pipe_config);
>
> - edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> - edp_panel_on(intel_dp);
> - edp_panel_vdd_off(intel_dp, true);
> + intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_on_unlocked(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_off_unlocked(intel_dp, true);
> }
>
> if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv)) {
> @@ -5818,7 +5818,7 @@ void intel_dp_encoder_flush_work(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> * Make sure vdd is actually turned off here.
> */
> with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> - edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(intel_dp);
> }
>
> intel_dp_aux_fini(intel_dp);
> @@ -5846,7 +5846,7 @@ void intel_dp_encoder_suspend(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder)
> */
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&intel_dp->panel_vdd_work);
> with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> - edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(intel_dp);
> }
>
> void intel_dp_encoder_shutdown(struct intel_encoder *intel_encoder)
> @@ -6706,7 +6706,7 @@ static bool intel_edp_init_connector(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> * Make sure vdd is actually turned off here.
> */
> with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> - edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(intel_dp);
>
> return false;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> index 1f8ea3c41440..01c9e69f4e3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
> @@ -559,11 +559,11 @@ static u32 ilk_get_pp_control(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Must be paired with edp_panel_vdd_off().
> + * Must be paired with intel_pps_vdd_off_unlocked().
> * Must hold pps_mutex around the whole on/off sequence.
> * Can be nested with intel_pps_vdd_{on,off}() calls.
> */
> -bool edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +bool intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> @@ -635,13 +635,13 @@ void intel_pps_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> vdd = false;
> with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> - vdd = edp_panel_vdd_on(intel_dp);
> + vdd = intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked(intel_dp);
> I915_STATE_WARN(!vdd, "[ENCODER:%d:%s] VDD already requested on\n",
> dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.base.id,
> dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.name);
> }
>
> -void edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port =
> @@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ void edp_panel_vdd_work(struct work_struct *__work)
>
> with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref) {
> if (!intel_dp->want_panel_vdd)
> - edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(intel_dp);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ static void edp_panel_vdd_schedule_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> * Must hold pps_mutex around the whole on/off sequence.
> * Can be nested with intel_pps_vdd_{on,off}() calls.
> */
> -void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync)
> +void intel_pps_vdd_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
>
> @@ -729,12 +729,12 @@ void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync)
> intel_dp->want_panel_vdd = false;
>
> if (sync)
> - edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(intel_dp);
> else
> edp_panel_vdd_schedule_off(intel_dp);
> }
>
> -void edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> u32 pp;
> @@ -791,10 +791,10 @@ void intel_pps_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return;
>
> with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> - edp_panel_on(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_on_unlocked(intel_dp);
> }
>
> -void edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +void intel_pps_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> struct intel_digital_port *dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ void intel_pps_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> return;
>
> with_intel_pps_lock(intel_dp, wakeref)
> - edp_panel_off(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_off_unlocked(intel_dp);
> }
>
> /* Enable backlight in the panel power control. */
> @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ static void vlv_detach_power_sequencer(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> if (drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, pipe != PIPE_A && pipe != PIPE_B))
> return;
>
> - edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(intel_dp);
> + intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(intel_dp);
>
> /*
> * VLV seems to get confused when multiple power sequencers
> @@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> * hooked up to any port. This would mess up the
> * power domain tracking the first time we pick
> * one of these power sequencers for use since
> - * edp_panel_vdd_on() would notice that the VDD was
> + * intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked() would notice that the VDD was
> * already on and therefore wouldn't grab the power
> * domain reference. Disable VDD first to avoid this.
> * This also avoids spuriously turning the VDD on as
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> index 69f670678d0e..e7f0473be9a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.h
> @@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ void intel_pps_backlight_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> void intel_pps_backlight_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> void intel_pps_backlight_power(struct intel_connector *connector, bool enable);
>
> -bool edp_panel_vdd_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -void edp_panel_vdd_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync);
> -void edp_panel_vdd_off_sync(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -void edp_panel_on(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> -void edp_panel_off(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +bool intel_pps_vdd_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_vdd_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool sync);
> +void intel_pps_vdd_off_sync_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_on_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> +void intel_pps_off_unlocked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> void edp_panel_vdd_work(struct work_struct *__work);
>
> void intel_pps_vdd_sanitize(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
