Quoting Imre Deak (2020-12-01 10:52:22) > On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:14:40AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Imre Deak (2020-11-30 22:47:08) > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:07:01PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > Quoting Imre Deak (2020-11-30 21:22:00) > > > > > All the display power domain references are wakeref tracked now, so we > > > > > can mark intel_display_power_put_unchecked() as an internal function > > > > > (for suppressing wakeref tracking in non-debug builds). > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Ok, after all previous patches it will only be called from the header > > > > after throwing away the wakeref. > > > > > > > > I have a sneaky suspicion you might take another path after reviewing > > > > the danger caused by the debug build, > > > > > > Yes, how about also adding: > > > > > > +static inline void > > > +____intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *i915, > > > + enum intel_display_power_domain domain, > > > + intel_wakeref_t wakeref) > > > +{ > > > + intel_display_power_put_unchecked(i915, domain); > > > +} > > > + > > > static inline void > > > intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *i915, > > > enum intel_display_power_domain domain, > > > intel_wakeref_t wakeref) > > > { > > > - intel_display_power_put_unchecked(i915, domain); > > > + ____intel_display_power_put(i915, domain, wakeref); > > > } > > > > > > (and similar change for intel_display_power_put_async()) ? > > > > Hmm. The compiler shouldn't DCE the wakeref since it has a side-effect. > > We can but see. > > Yes, arguments passed to functions are evaluated exactly once. The above > extra call doesn't make sense anyway. > > Are you ok with patch 4 then? If you've done a quick non-debug test run, then I'm convinced I was barking up the wrong tree. The remaining patches are Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (since they were all blocked by the uncertainty in behaviour of the fetch_and_zero). -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx