On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:07:01PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Imre Deak (2020-11-30 21:22:00) > > All the display power domain references are wakeref tracked now, so we > > can mark intel_display_power_put_unchecked() as an internal function > > (for suppressing wakeref tracking in non-debug builds). > > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> > > Ok, after all previous patches it will only be called from the header > after throwing away the wakeref. > > I have a sneaky suspicion you might take another path after reviewing > the danger caused by the debug build, Yes, how about also adding: +static inline void +____intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *i915, + enum intel_display_power_domain domain, + intel_wakeref_t wakeref) +{ + intel_display_power_put_unchecked(i915, domain); +} + static inline void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *i915, enum intel_display_power_domain domain, intel_wakeref_t wakeref) { - intel_display_power_put_unchecked(i915, domain); + ____intel_display_power_put(i915, domain, wakeref); } (and similar change for intel_display_power_put_async()) ? > but if you want to keep this patch, > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx