Ville noticed that the last mocs entry is used unconditionally by the HW when it performs cache evictions, and noted that while the value is not meant to be writable by the driver, we should program it to a reasonable value nevertheless. As it turns out, we can change the value of mocs:63 and the value we were programming into it would cause hard hangs in conjunction with atomic operations. v2: Add details from bspec about how it is used by HW Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2707 Fixes: 3bbaba0ceaa2 ("drm/i915: Added Programming of the MOCS") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.3+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c index 254873e1646e..26cedde80476 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c @@ -131,7 +131,19 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry skl_mocs_table[] = { GEN9_MOCS_ENTRIES, MOCS_ENTRY(I915_MOCS_CACHED, LE_3_WB | LE_TC_2_LLC_ELLC | LE_LRUM(3), - L3_3_WB) + L3_3_WB), + + /* + * mocs:63 + * - used by the L3 for all its evictions. + * Thus it is expected to allow LLC cacheability to enable coherent + * flows to be maintained. + * - used to force L3 uncachable cycles. + * Thus it is expected to make the surce L3 uncacheable. + */ + MOCS_ENTRY(63, + LE_3_WB | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_LRUM(3), + L3_1_UC) }; /* NOTE: the LE_TGT_CACHE is not used on Broxton */ -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
