On 10/30/20 11:11 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 30-10-2020 om 10:26 schreef Thomas Hellström (Intel):
On 10/16/20 12:43 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
We should not allow this any more, as it will break with the new userptr
implementation, it could still be made to work, but there's no point in
doing so.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ifdefs don't appear consistent with the commit message. Wrong patch or separate patch?
Also please add a discussion what impact this has on existing user-space.
Regarding ifdefs, all the userptr codeis unused when mmu notifers are not available, so I made it conditional on that.
Yes I have nothing against the cange itself. But this is a fixup change
that has nothing to do with rejecting UNSYNCHRONIZED and thus it should
be moved to a separate commit or perhaps squashed in the big userptr
rewrite?
/Thomas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
