Re: [PATCH v4 14/61] drm/i915: Reject UNSYNCHRONIZED for userptr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10/30/20 11:10 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 30-10-2020 om 10:26 schreef Thomas Hellström (Intel):
On 10/16/20 12:43 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
We should not allow this any more, as it will break with the new userptr
implementation, it could still be made to work, but there's no point in
doing so.

Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ifdefs don't appear consistent with the commit message. Wrong patch or separate patch?

Also please add a discussion what impact this has on existing user-space.


Impact should be low, xf86-video-intel with SNA was using unsynchronized, but will fall back to synchronized if not available.

Sounds ok to me if that's the only impact. Also here the review comment was about adding to the commit message.


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux