On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:48 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > Hmm, those are both committed after our last -next pull request, so they > > would normally only target next merge window. drm-next closes the merge > > window around -rc5 already. > > > > But, in this specific case those are both Fixes: patches with Cc: stable, > > so they should be pulled into drm-intel-next-fixes PR. > > > > Rodrigo, can you cherry-pick those patches to -next-fixes that you send > > to Dave? > > They still haven't made it to linux-next. I think for now I'll just > rebase without them again and then you can handle the conflicts for > 5.11. Yeah after -rc6 drm is frozen for features, so anything that's stuck in subordinate trees rolls over to the next merge cycle. To avoid upsetting sfr from linux-next we keep those -next branches out of linux-next until after -rc1 again. iow, rebasing onto linux-next and smashing this into 5.10 sounds like the right approach (since everyone else freezes a bunch later afaik). Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
