Re: remove alloc_vm_area v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Christoph Hellwig (2020-09-28 15:37:41)
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:13:38PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > I think we have a gap that after splitting the drm-intel-next pull requests into
> > two the drm-intel/for-linux-next branch is now missing material from
> > drm-intel/drm-intel-gt-next.
> > 
> > I think a simple course of action might be to start including drm-intel-gt-next
> > in linux-next, which would mean that we should update DIM tooling to add
> > extra branch "drm-intel/gt-for-linux-next" or so.
> > 
> > Which specific patches are missing in this case?
> 
> The two dependencies required by my series not in mainline are:
> 
>     drm/i915/gem: Avoid implicit vmap for highmem on x86-32
>     drm/i915/gem: Prevent using pgprot_writecombine() if PAT is not supported
> 
> so it has to be one or both of those.

Hmm, those are both committed after our last -next pull request, so they
would normally only target next merge window. drm-next closes the merge
window around -rc5 already.

But, in this specific case those are both Fixes: patches with Cc: stable,
so they should be pulled into drm-intel-next-fixes PR.

Rodrigo, can you cherry-pick those patches to -next-fixes that you send
to Dave?

Regards, Joonas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux