Re: [PATCH v5 05/22] drm/i915/dg1: Wait for pcode/uncore handshake at startup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 04:24:17PM -0700, Jose Souza wrote:
On Fri, 2020-07-24 at 14:39 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
From: Matt Roper <
matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx
>

DG1 does some additional pcode/uncore handshaking at
boot time; this handshaking must complete before various other pcode
commands are effective and before general work is submitted to the GPU.
We need to poll a new pcode mailbox during startup until it reports that
this handshaking is complete.

The bspec doesn't give guidance on how long we may need to wait for this
handshaking to complete.  For now, let's just set a really long timeout;
if we still don't get a completion status by the end of that timeout,
we'll just continue on and hope for the best.

Bspec: 52065
Cc: Clinton Taylor <
Clinton.A.Taylor@xxxxxxxxx
>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <
ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <
radhakrishna.sripada@xxxxxxxxx
>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <
matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx
>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <
lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx
>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c       |  3 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h       |  3 +++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
index 5fd5af4bc855..5473bfe9126c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@
 #include "intel_gvt.h"
 #include "intel_memory_region.h"
 #include "intel_pm.h"
+#include "intel_sideband.h"
 #include "vlv_suspend.h"

 static struct drm_driver driver;
@@ -737,6 +738,8 @@ static int i915_driver_hw_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 */
 	intel_dram_detect(dev_priv);

+	intel_pcode_init(dev_priv);
+
 	intel_bw_init_hw(dev_priv);

 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index a0d31f3bf634..3767b32127da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -9245,6 +9245,9 @@ enum {
 #define     GEN9_SAGV_DISABLE			0x0
 #define     GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED		0x1
 #define     GEN9_SAGV_ENABLE			0x3
+#define   DG1_PCODE_STATUS			0x7E
+#define     DG1_CHECK_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS	0x0
+#define     DG1_UNCORE_INIT_COMPLETE		0x1

With s/DG1_CHECK_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS/DG1_CHECK_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS_COMPLETE or something similar that makes easy to understand that 0x1 is the response
of the DG1_CHECK_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS sub-command.

checking all the other users of skl_pcode_request() I don't see a
pattern there. Examples:

ret = skl_pcode_request(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
SKL_CDCLK_PREPARE_FOR_CHANGE, SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, SKL_CDCLK_READY_FOR_CHANGE, 3); ret = skl_pcode_request(dev_priv, GEN9_PCODE_SAGV_CONTROL, GEN9_SAGV_DISABLE, GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED, GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED, 1);
Giveng the current uses, I'd rather rename like:

+#define   DG1_PCODE_STATUS			0x7E
+#define     DG1_UNCORE_GET_INIT_STATUS		0x0
+#define     DG1_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS_COMPLETE	0x1


Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>

does that still stands with the rename above?

thanks
Lucas De Marchi



 #define GEN12_PCODE_READ_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME_US	0x23
 #define GEN6_PCODE_DATA				_MMIO(0x138128)
 #define   GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_IA_RATIO_SHIFT	8
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
index 916ccd1c0e96..8b093525240d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
@@ -543,3 +543,18 @@ int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 request,
 	return ret ? ret : status;
 #undef COND
 }
+
+void intel_pcode_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!IS_DGFX(i915))
+		return;
+
+	ret = skl_pcode_request(i915, DG1_PCODE_STATUS,
+				DG1_CHECK_UNCORE_INIT_STATUS,
+				DG1_UNCORE_INIT_COMPLETE,
+				DG1_UNCORE_INIT_COMPLETE, 50);
+	if (ret)
+		drm_err(&i915->drm, "Pcode did not report uncore initialization completion!\n");
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
index 7fb95745a444..094c7b19c5d4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.h
@@ -138,4 +138,6 @@ int sandybridge_pcode_write_timeout(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox,
 int skl_pcode_request(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u32 mbox, u32 request,
 		      u32 reply_mask, u32 reply, int timeout_base_ms);

+void intel_pcode_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
+
 #endif /* _INTEL_SIDEBAND_H */

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux