Hi, On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 11:23, Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My concern with going in this direction was that we potentially allow > an application to allocate a lot of kernel memory but not a lot of fds > by creating lots of fences and then closing the fds but never > signaling them. Is that not an issue? sw_sync is a userspace DoS mechanism by design - if someone wants to enable and use it, they have bigger problems than unbounded memory allocations. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
