Hi Chris, My concern with going in this direction was that we potentially allow an application to allocate a lot of kernel memory but not a lot of fds by creating lots of fences and then closing the fds but never signaling them. Is that not an issue? - Bas On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:04 PM Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > dma_fence_release() objects to a fence being freed before it is > signaled, so instead of playing fancy tricks to avoid handling dying > requests, let's keep the syncpt alive until signaled. This neatly > removes the issue with having to decouple the syncpt from the timeline > upon fence release. > -Chris > > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
