Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/i915: Parametrize PFIT_PIPE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:48:26PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 07:43:51PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Make the PFIT_PIPE stuff less ugly via parametrization.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c | 3 +--
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h            | 1 +
> > >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> > > index cba2f1c2557f..8b0730f4c442 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
> > > @@ -434,8 +434,7 @@ void intel_gmch_panel_fitting(struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc,
> > >  	/* 965+ wants fuzzy fitting */
> > >  	/* FIXME: handle multiple panels by failing gracefully */
> > >  	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 4)
> > > -		pfit_control |= ((intel_crtc->pipe << PFIT_PIPE_SHIFT) |
> > > -				 PFIT_FILTER_FUZZY);
> > > +		pfit_control |= PFIT_PIPE(intel_crtc->pipe) | PFIT_FILTER_FUZZY;
> > >  
> > >  out:
> > >  	if ((pfit_control & PFIT_ENABLE) == 0) {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > index b09c1d6dc0aa..faf8945a51b0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > @@ -4928,6 +4928,7 @@ enum {
> > >  #define   PFIT_ENABLE		(1 << 31)
> > >  #define   PFIT_PIPE_MASK	(3 << 29)
> > >  #define   PFIT_PIPE_SHIFT	29
> > > +#define   PFIT_PIPE(pipe)	((pipe) << 29)
> > 
> > This is fine, but might have as well defined this in terms of
> > REG_FIELD_PREP. I especially like it for parametrized stuff because it
> > ensures we don't flood the value outside the field.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Was just reviewing this series and noticed that Jani had suggested using
> REG_FIELD_PREP stuff here, are you going to change that Ville?

IIRC I already pushed this.

> 
> Looks good otherwise
> 
> Manasi
> > 
> > >  #define   VERT_INTERP_DISABLE	(0 << 10)
> > >  #define   VERT_INTERP_BILINEAR	(1 << 10)
> > >  #define   VERT_INTERP_MASK	(3 << 10)
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux