Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/execlists: Pull tasklet interrupt-bh local to direct submission

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-03-24 16:11:10)
> 
> On 24/03/2020 12:07, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > We dropped calling process_csb prior to handling direct submission in
> > order to avoid the nesting of spinlocks and lift process_csb() and the
> > majority of the tasklet out of irq-off. However, we do want to avoid
> > ksoftirqd latency in the fast path, so try and pull the interrupt-bh
> > local to direct submission if we can acquire the tasklet's lock.
> 
> Oh and important question - who benefits and how much?

Anything that doesn't want to be deferred to a tasklet like wsim, where
it helps fix a small regression in tip. That and avoiding the worker
where we didn't use to have one. Did not see a difference in syslatency,
so that's still a bone of contention for direction submission.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux