On 24/03/2020 12:07, Chris Wilson wrote:
We dropped calling process_csb prior to handling direct submission in
order to avoid the nesting of spinlocks and lift process_csb() and the
majority of the tasklet out of irq-off. However, we do want to avoid
ksoftirqd latency in the fast path, so try and pull the interrupt-bh
local to direct submission if we can acquire the tasklet's lock.
Oh and important question - who benefits and how much?
Regards,
Tvrtko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 210f60e14ef4..82dee2141b46 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -2891,6 +2891,12 @@ static void __submit_queue_imm(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
if (reset_in_progress(execlists))
return; /* defer until we restart the engine following reset */
+ /* Hopefully we clear execlists->pending[] to let us through */
+ if (execlists->pending[0] && tasklet_trylock(&execlists->tasklet)) {
+ process_csb(engine);
+ tasklet_unlock(&execlists->tasklet);
+ }
+
__execlists_submission_tasklet(engine);
}
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
