Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2020-02-05 14:03:14)
> Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > We have been using '-1' to mean the maximum i915.reset level in the
> > belief that it was unsigned... This turns out to have been a grave
> > error, and instead of setting the default reset mechanism in igt,
> > we have been disabling reset!
>
> Disabling engine reset?
Hmm, Right,
bool intel_has_gpu_reset(const struct intel_gt *gt)
{
if (!i915_modparams.reset)
return NULL;
return intel_get_gpu_reset(gt);
}
bool intel_has_reset_engine(const struct intel_gt *gt)
{
if (i915_modparams.reset < 2)
return false;
return INTEL_INFO(gt->i915)->has_reset_engine;
}
just engine-reset. Still that wasn't the intention when setting -1.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
