Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > We have been using '-1' to mean the maximum i915.reset level in the > belief that it was unsigned... This turns out to have been a grave > error, and instead of setting the default reset mechanism in igt, > we have been disabling reset! Disabling engine reset? -Mika > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h > index cb16410c2ada..45323732f099 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct drm_printer; > param(char *, dmc_firmware_path, NULL, 0400) \ > param(int, mmio_debug, -IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_MMIO), 0600) \ > param(int, edp_vswing, 0, 0400) \ > - param(int, reset, 3, 0600) \ > + param(unsigned int, reset, 3, 0600) \ > param(unsigned int, inject_probe_failure, 0, 0600) \ > param(int, fastboot, -1, 0600) \ > param(int, enable_dpcd_backlight, -1, 0600) \ > -- > 2.25.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
