Re: [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915/dsb: Inline DSB_CTRL writes into intel_dsb_commit()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 06:32:04PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Ville Syrjala (2020-01-29 18:20:31)
> > +       intel_de_write(dev_priv, DSB_CTRL(pipe, dsb->id),
> > +                      DSB_ENABLE);
> > +       intel_de_write(dev_priv, DSB_HEAD(pipe, dsb->id),
> > +                      i915_ggtt_offset(dsb->vma));
> >         intel_de_write(dev_priv, DSB_TAIL(pipe, dsb->id),
> >                        i915_ggtt_offset(dsb->vma) + tail);
> 
> I still say this order looks dodgy for a ringbuffer. Is it all truly
> latched by DSB_TAIL or might it start passing on being enabled and HEAD
> != TAIL?

My initial thoughts as well, but indeed it's the tail write that
makes it go (or at least that's what the docs say).

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux