On 26/01/2020 10:23, Chris Wilson wrote:
Do an early rejection of a i915_vma_unbind() attempt if the i915_vma is
currently pinned, without waiting to see if the inflight operations may
unpin it. We see this problem with the shrinker trying to unbind the
active vma from inside its bind worker:
<6> [472.618968] Workqueue: events_unbound fence_work [i915]
<4> [472.618970] Call Trace:
<4> [472.618974] ? __schedule+0x2e5/0x810
<4> [472.618978] schedule+0x37/0xe0
<4> [472.618982] schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20
<4> [472.618984] __mutex_lock+0x281/0x9c0
<4> [472.618987] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
<4> [472.618989] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x60
<4> [472.619038] ? i915_vma_unbind+0xae/0x110 [i915]
<4> [472.619084] ? i915_vma_unbind+0xae/0x110 [i915]
<4> [472.619122] i915_vma_unbind+0xae/0x110 [i915]
<4> [472.619165] i915_gem_object_unbind+0x1dc/0x400 [i915]
<4> [472.619208] i915_gem_shrink+0x328/0x660 [i915]
<4> [472.619250] ? i915_gem_shrink_all+0x38/0x60 [i915]
<4> [472.619282] i915_gem_shrink_all+0x38/0x60 [i915]
<4> [472.619325] vm_alloc_page.constprop.25+0x1aa/0x240 [i915]
<4> [472.619330] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4d/0x80
<4> [472.619363] ? __alloc_pd+0xb/0x30 [i915]
<4> [472.619366] ? module_assert_mutex_or_preempt+0xf/0x30
<4> [472.619368] ? __module_address+0x23/0xe0
<4> [472.619371] ? is_module_address+0x26/0x40
<4> [472.619374] ? static_obj+0x34/0x50
<4> [472.619376] ? lockdep_init_map+0x4d/0x1e0
<4> [472.619407] setup_page_dma+0xd/0x90 [i915]
<4> [472.619437] alloc_pd+0x29/0x50 [i915]
<4> [472.619470] __gen8_ppgtt_alloc+0x443/0x6b0 [i915]
<4> [472.619503] gen8_ppgtt_alloc+0xd7/0x300 [i915]
<4> [472.619535] ppgtt_bind_vma+0x2a/0xe0 [i915]
<4> [472.619577] __vma_bind+0x26/0x40 [i915]
<4> [472.619611] fence_work+0x1c/0x90 [i915]
<4> [472.619617] process_one_work+0x26a/0x620
Fixes: 2850748ef876 ("drm/i915: Pull i915_vma_pin under the vm->mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 17 +++++------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
index 84e03da0d5f9..2ffc68e18dd0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
@@ -1190,18 +1190,6 @@ int __i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
lockdep_assert_held(&vma->vm->mutex);
- /*
- * First wait upon any activity as retiring the request may
- * have side-effects such as unpinning or even unbinding this vma.
- *
- * XXX Actually waiting under the vm->mutex is a hinderance and
- * should be pipelined wherever possible. In cases where that is
- * unavoidable, we should lift the wait to before the mutex.
- */
- ret = i915_vma_sync(vma);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma)) {
vma_print_allocator(vma, "is pinned");
return -EAGAIN;
@@ -1275,6 +1263,11 @@ int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
return 0;
+ if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma)) {
+ vma_print_allocator(vma, "is pinned");
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
+
if (i915_vma_is_bound(vma, I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND))
/* XXX not always required: nop_clear_range */
wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&vm->i915->runtime_pm);
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
