On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 03:59:59PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > Move away from I915_READ_FW() and I915_WRITE_FW() and switch to using > intel_uncore_read_fw() and intel_uncore_write_fw(), respectively. > > No functional changes. > > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c > index ae25960f74e0..6a408e11a3de 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c > @@ -315,7 +315,8 @@ void intel_csr_load_program(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > preempt_disable(); > > for (i = 0; i < fw_size; i++) > - I915_WRITE_FW(CSR_PROGRAM(i), payload[i]); > + intel_uncore_write_fw(&dev_priv->uncore, CSR_PROGRAM(i), > + payload[i]); Why uncore instead of de? > > preempt_enable(); > > -- > 2.20.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
