On Fri, 17 Jan 2020, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jani, > >> >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > I've never been a fan of non human accounts, we had this discussion >> > already in a different mailing list. Could you please find a >> > different way of giving credit to your CI system? >> >> I don't actually mind for Reported-by credits. The history is full of >> things like: >> >> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> >> Reported-by: syzbot+ec24e95ea483de0a24da@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > That's just commit log unnecessary pollution, unwanted mail > reference... no one will ever answer at lkp@xxxxxxxxx, why > reference it, then? It's not about that, it's about giving credit to whom credit is due. >> Care to reference the discussion? > > Here in the Samsung list we had a discussion with another Huawei > developer about the Hulk Robot: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/4/635 Well, there's no consensus there either. Again, if they want to use that Reported-by: line, I'm fine with it. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
