On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:58:45 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:03:09 +0100 > Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > > > A few of the earlier registers where enlarged and so the Base Data of > > Stolen Memory Register (BDSM) was pushed to 0xb0. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org> > > This patch seems irrelevant to me. I have a i915_stolen_to_phys which > already looks correct (git blame shows you last updated it in April). > > Can you help unconfuse me? As the patch suggests the current registers being used by stolen-to-phys are incorrect for SNB+. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
