On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:03:09 +0100
Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> A few of the earlier registers where enlarged and so the Base Data of
> Stolen Memory Register (BDSM) was pushed to 0xb0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes at virtuousgeek.org>
This patch seems irrelevant to me. I have a i915_stolen_to_phys which
already looks correct (git blame shows you last updated it in April).
Can you help unconfuse me?
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c index a01ff74..d023ed6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,14 @@ static unsigned long
> i915_stolen_to_physical(struct drm_device *dev)
> * its value of TOLUD.
> */
> base = 0;
> - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 3 || IS_G33(dev)) {
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6) {
> + /* Read Base Data of Stolen Memory Register (BDSM)
> directly.
> + * Note that there is also a MCHBAR miror at
> 0x1080c0 or
> + * we could use device 2:0x5c instead.
> + */
> + pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xB0, &base);
> + base &= ~4095; /* lower bits used for locking
> register */
> + } else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 3 || IS_G33(dev)) {
> /* Read Graphics Base of Stolen Memory directly */
> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, 0xA4, &base);
> #if 0
> @@ -172,6 +179,9 @@ int i915_gem_init_stolen(struct drm_device *dev)
> if (dev_priv->mm.stolen_base == 0)
> return 0;
>
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("found %d bytes of stolen memory at %08lx\n",
> + dev_priv->mm.gtt->stolen_size,
> dev_priv->mm.stolen_base); +
> /* Basic memrange allocator for stolen space */
> drm_mm_init(&dev_priv->mm.stolen, 0, prealloc_size);
>
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
