On 12/17/19 1:59 AM, Manasi Navare wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:54:55AM +0200, Tomi Sarvela wrote:
On 12/12/19 11:28 PM, Manasi Navare wrote:
The KBL failure does not look related to the changes in this patch series.
Tomi, could you confirm if this is a false negative?
Manasi
The failures with the patchset seem same as all the other results from
live_gt_pm: just that kbl-x1275 hasn't been ticked to the bugfilter,
probably because it hasn't survived the test before (module_reload).
I've triggered shard-run for this series.
Any updates on the shard-run results?
Results are available at normal place:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15701/index.html
Tomi
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 02:46:49AM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] drm: Handle connector tile support only for modes that match tile size
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70790/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7545 -> Patchwork_15701
====================================================
Summary
-------
**FAILURE**
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15701/index.html
Possible new issues
-------------------
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_15701:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible regressions ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_pm:
- fi-kbl-x1275: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][1]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15701/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_pm.html
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15701/index.html
--
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
