On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 10:54:55AM +0200, Tomi Sarvela wrote: > On 12/12/19 11:28 PM, Manasi Navare wrote: > >The KBL failure does not look related to the changes in this patch series. > >Tomi, could you confirm if this is a false negative? > > > >Manasi > > The failures with the patchset seem same as all the other results from > live_gt_pm: just that kbl-x1275 hasn't been ticked to the bugfilter, > probably because it hasn't survived the test before (module_reload). > > I've triggered shard-run for this series. Any updates on the shard-run results? Manasi > > Tomi > > >On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 02:46:49AM +0000, Patchwork wrote: > >>== Series Details == > >> > >>Series: series starting with [1/2] drm: Handle connector tile support only for modes that match tile size > >>URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/70790/ > >>State : failure > >> > >>== Summary == > >> > >>CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7545 -> Patchwork_15701 > >>==================================================== > >> > >>Summary > >>------- > >> > >> **FAILURE** > > >> External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15701/index.html > >> > >>Possible new issues > >>------------------- > >> > >> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_15701: > >> > >>### IGT changes ### > >> > >>#### Possible regressions #### > >> > >> * igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_pm: > >> - fi-kbl-x1275: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][1] > >> [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15701/fi-kbl-x1275/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_pm.html > > >> > >>== Logs == > >> > >>For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_15701/index.html > > > -- > Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx