On 11/11/2019 12:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-11-11 09:53:08)The ordering of the checks in the existing code can lead to holding preemption not being considered as privileged op. Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx> Fixes: 9cd20ef7803c ("drm/i915/perf: allow holding preemption on filtered ctx")Oops, that'll teach me for not looking at the result more carefully. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -Chris
My bad... and thanks! Pushed. -Lionel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
