Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-11-11 09:53:08)
> The ordering of the checks in the existing code can lead to holding
> preemption not being considered as privileged op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 9cd20ef7803c ("drm/i915/perf: allow holding preemption on filtered ctx")
Oops, that'll teach me for not looking at the result more carefully.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
