On 11/1/19 1:21 PM, Petri Latvala wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:56:37AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-11-01 10:51:06)
The gem_exec_reloc basic subtests cover a couple dozen basic ABI
sanitychecks, aiming to prove the ABI works. While relocations used to
be essential, they are no longer the basis of current clients who all
softpin. It is a stagnant portion of the ABI that does not contribute
much to overall driver health (the complicated portions of relocs are
covered in the smoketests like gem_exec_parallel and gem_exec_gttfill).
However, even though each of the basic subtest is trivial and runs in
very little time, since CI is running each individually the time between
tests mounts up (especially on eMMC devices like fi-kbl-soraka).
By moving these tests to the shards we should speed up BAT on the
ratelimiting fi-kbl-soraka, while losing no coverage overall -- and
hopefully without losing any of the predictive failure coverage in BAT.
This stagnant bit of uAPI/uABI will remain checked by the irregular idle
runs.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Before Joonas went fishing, he gave +1. So,
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tomi, Petri, Martin any objections?
-Chris
Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx>
Looks reasonable, and I like it.
Acked-by: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@xxxxxxxxx>
--
Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
