On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 10:56:37AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-11-01 10:51:06) > > The gem_exec_reloc basic subtests cover a couple dozen basic ABI > > sanitychecks, aiming to prove the ABI works. While relocations used to > > be essential, they are no longer the basis of current clients who all > > softpin. It is a stagnant portion of the ABI that does not contribute > > much to overall driver health (the complicated portions of relocs are > > covered in the smoketests like gem_exec_parallel and gem_exec_gttfill). > > However, even though each of the basic subtest is trivial and runs in > > very little time, since CI is running each individually the time between > > tests mounts up (especially on eMMC devices like fi-kbl-soraka). > > > > By moving these tests to the shards we should speed up BAT on the > > ratelimiting fi-kbl-soraka, while losing no coverage overall -- and > > hopefully without losing any of the predictive failure coverage in BAT. > > This stagnant bit of uAPI/uABI will remain checked by the irregular idle > > runs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Before Joonas went fishing, he gave +1. So, > Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Tomi, Petri, Martin any objections? > -Chris Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
