On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 08:51:20PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote: > > On 10/22/2019 5:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 03:29:44PM +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote: > >> This patch adds a scaling filter mode porperty > >> to allow: > >> - A driver/HW to showcase it's scaling filter capabilities. > >> - A userspace to pick a desired effect while scaling. > >> > >> This option will be particularly useful in the scenarios where > >> Integer mode scaling is possible, and a UI client wants to pick > >> filters like Nearest-neighbor applied for non-blurry outputs. > >> > >> There was a RFC patch series published, to discus the request to enable > >> Integer mode scaling by some of the gaming communities, which can be > >> found here: > >> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/66175/ > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c | 4 ++++ > >> include/drm/drm_crtc.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> include/drm/drm_mode_config.h | 6 ++++++ > >> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c > >> index 0d466d3b0809..883329453a86 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c > >> @@ -435,6 +435,8 @@ static int drm_atomic_crtc_set_property(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > >> return ret; > >> } else if (property == config->prop_vrr_enabled) { > >> state->vrr_enabled = val; > >> + } else if (property == config->scaling_filter_property) { > >> + state->scaling_filter = val; > >> } else if (property == config->degamma_lut_property) { > >> ret = drm_atomic_replace_property_blob_from_id(dev, > >> &state->degamma_lut, > >> @@ -503,6 +505,8 @@ drm_atomic_crtc_get_property(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > >> *val = (state->gamma_lut) ? state->gamma_lut->base.id : 0; > >> else if (property == config->prop_out_fence_ptr) > >> *val = 0; > >> + else if (property == config->scaling_filter_property) > >> + *val = state->scaling_filter; > >> else if (crtc->funcs->atomic_get_property) > >> return crtc->funcs->atomic_get_property(crtc, state, property, val); > >> else > >> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h > >> index 5e9b15a0e8c5..94c5509474a8 100644 > >> --- a/include/drm/drm_crtc.h > >> +++ b/include/drm/drm_crtc.h > >> @@ -58,6 +58,25 @@ struct device_node; > >> struct dma_fence; > >> struct edid; > >> > >> +enum drm_scaling_filters { > >> + DRM_SCALING_FILTER_DEFAULT, > >> + DRM_SCALING_FILTER_MEDIUM, > >> + DRM_SCALING_FILTER_BILINEAR, > >> + DRM_SCALING_FILTER_NN, > >> + DRM_SCALING_FILTER_NN_IS_ONLY, > >> + DRM_SCALING_FILTER_EDGE_ENHANCE, > >> + DRM_SCALING_FILTER_INVALID, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static const struct drm_prop_enum_list drm_scaling_filter_enum_list[] = { > >> + { DRM_SCALING_FILTER_DEFAULT, "Default" }, > >> + { DRM_SCALING_FILTER_MEDIUM, "Medium" }, > >> + { DRM_SCALING_FILTER_BILINEAR, "Bilinear" }, > >> + { DRM_SCALING_FILTER_NN, "Nearest Neighbor" }, > >> + { DRM_SCALING_FILTER_NN_IS_ONLY, "Integer Mode Scaling" }, > >> + { DRM_SCALING_FILTER_INVALID, "Invalid" }, > >> +}; > >> + > >> static inline int64_t U642I64(uint64_t val) > >> { > >> return (int64_t)*((int64_t *)&val); > >> @@ -283,6 +302,13 @@ struct drm_crtc_state { > >> */ > >> u32 target_vblank; > >> > >> + /** > >> + * @scaling_filter: > >> + * > >> + * Scaling filter mode to be applied > >> + */ > >> + u32 scaling_filter; > >> + > >> /** > >> * @async_flip: > >> * > >> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h b/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h > >> index 3bcbe30339f0..efd6fd55770f 100644 > >> --- a/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h > >> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h > >> @@ -914,6 +914,12 @@ struct drm_mode_config { > >> */ > >> struct drm_property *modifiers_property; > >> > >> + /** > >> + * @scaling_filter_property: CRTC property to apply a particular filter > >> + * while scaling in panel fitter mode. > >> + */ > >> + struct drm_property *scaling_filter_property; > > This needs to per-crtc/plane. > > I am not getting this, why ? It's not different than any other CRTC > property like gamma/CSC etc, where we just attach them to corresponding > CRTC, isn't it ? Different crtcs/planes can have different capabilities, and so not all of them may want to expose all the possible filters. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx