On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:25:53AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > My preference would be to use 'symbols'. I tried to come up with something > > but 'symbols' is better than anything I came up with. > > Maybe 'interfaces' or 'artifacts'. The term 'symbols' is just as > imprecise as 'functions'. I suggested 'identifier' because that's the term used in the C spec (6.2.1): : An identifier can denote an object; a function; a tag or a member : of a structure, union, or enumeration; a typedef name; a label name; : a macro name; or a macro parameter. We don't allow documenting all those things separately, but it does cover all the things we do allow to be individually documented. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
