On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:54:39AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:25:53AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > My preference would be to use 'symbols'. I tried to come up with something > > > but 'symbols' is better than anything I came up with. > > > > Maybe 'interfaces' or 'artifacts'. The term 'symbols' is just as > > imprecise as 'functions'. > > I suggested 'identifier' because that's the term used in the C spec (6.2.1): > > : An identifier can denote an object; a function; a tag or a member > : of a structure, union, or enumeration; a typedef name; a label name; > : a macro name; or a macro parameter. > I also prefer this one now. I was looking for something like this. My original idea is 'prototype', but that is only for function. > We don't allow documenting all those things separately, but it does cover > all the things we do allow to be individually documented. -- Cheers, Changbin Du _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
