On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:23:42PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:12:23PM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > > == Series Details == > > > > Series: series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2) > > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67741/ > > State : failure > > > > == Summary == > > > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7042_full -> Patchwork_14725_full > > ==================================================== > > > > Summary > > ------- > > > > **FAILURE** > > > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14725_full absolutely need to be > > verified manually. > > > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > > introduced in Patchwork_14725_full, please notify your bug team to allow them > > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > > > > > Possible new issues > > ------------------- > > > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14725_full: > > > > ### IGT changes ### > > > > #### Possible regressions #### > > > > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us: > > - shard-snb: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] > > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb7/igt@gem_eio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb7/igt@gem_eio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes: > > - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +13 similar issues > > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_plane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_plane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > IGT-Version: 1.24-ge501741f > ... > Testing format AR30(0x30335241) / modifier 0x100000000000003 on A.0 > (kms_plane:1411) igt_fb-CRITICAL: Conversion not implemented (from format 0x30335241 to 0x78464749) > > DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010 = 0x30335241 > IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT = 0x78464749 > > { .name = "ARGB2101010", .depth = 30, .drm_id = DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010, > .pixman_id = PIXMAN_a2r10g10b10, > > { .name = "IGT-FLOAT", .depth = -1, .drm_id = IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT, > .pixman_id = PIXMAN_rgba_float, > > if ((drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->src.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid) && > (drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->dst.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid)) { > cnvert_pixman(cvt); > return; > ... > igt_assert_f(false, "Conversion not implemented ...); > > So wtf? > > Are we somehow compiling igt with an old pixman causing > #if PIXMAN_VERSION < PIXMAN_VERSION_ENCODE(0, 36, 0) > #define PIXMAN_rgba_float PIXMAN_invalid > #endif > to happen? oof, seems like the building machine got downgraded somehow ci-worker1:~$ dpkg -l '*pixman*' Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-===============================================-============================-============================-=================================================================================================== ii libpixman-1-0:amd64 0.34.0-2 amd64 pixel-manipulation library for X and cairo ii libpixman-1-dev:amd64 0.34.0-2 amd64 pixel-manipulation library for X and cairo (development files) that's bad... > But the reference run shows it testing all the fancy YUV formats so > I don't think that can be the case. That's the weird bit... Anyway the building machine needs updating and apt-mark hold. This can cause fallout and we need to file bugs to limit the noise. There is quite some queue right now, but hopefully by tomorrow it will be drained. I'll do the necessary updates and force IGT run to see what is going to happen in the morning. Then I'll rerun this series. -- Cheers, Arek _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
