On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 09:12:23PM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: series starting with [1/9] drm/i915: Expose 10:10:10 XRGB formats on SNB-BDW sprites (rev2) > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/67741/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7042_full -> Patchwork_14725_full > ==================================================== > > Summary > ------- > > **FAILURE** > > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_14725_full absolutely need to be > verified manually. > > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes > introduced in Patchwork_14725_full, please notify your bug team to allow them > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI. > > > > Possible new issues > ------------------- > > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_14725_full: > > ### IGT changes ### > > #### Possible regressions #### > > * igt@gem_eio@in-flight-1us: > - shard-snb: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] > [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-snb7/igt@gem_eio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-snb7/igt@gem_eio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > * igt@kms_plane@pixel-format-pipe-a-planes: > - shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +13 similar issues > [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7042/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_plane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14725/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_plane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx IGT-Version: 1.24-ge501741f ... Testing format AR30(0x30335241) / modifier 0x100000000000003 on A.0 (kms_plane:1411) igt_fb-CRITICAL: Conversion not implemented (from format 0x30335241 to 0x78464749) DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010 = 0x30335241 IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT = 0x78464749 { .name = "ARGB2101010", .depth = 30, .drm_id = DRM_FORMAT_ARGB2101010, .pixman_id = PIXMAN_a2r10g10b10, { .name = "IGT-FLOAT", .depth = -1, .drm_id = IGT_FORMAT_FLOAT, .pixman_id = PIXMAN_rgba_float, if ((drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->src.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid) && (drm_format_to_pixman(cvt->dst.fb->drm_format) != PIXMAN_invalid)) { cnvert_pixman(cvt); return; ... igt_assert_f(false, "Conversion not implemented ...); So wtf? Are we somehow compiling igt with an old pixman causing #if PIXMAN_VERSION < PIXMAN_VERSION_ENCODE(0, 36, 0) #define PIXMAN_rgba_float PIXMAN_invalid #endif to happen? But the reference run shows it testing all the fancy YUV formats so I don't think that can be the case. And my CHV can run this test with ARGB2101010 just fine so the code can't be totally broken. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
