On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 02:51:34PM -0700, James Ausmus wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:55:46PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 03:24:27PM -0700, James Ausmus wrote:
> > >Starting from TGL, we now need to read the SAGV block time via a PCODE
> > >mailbox, rather than having a static value.
> > >
> > >BSpec: 49326
> > >
> > >v2: Fix up pcode val data type (Ville), tighten variable scope (Ville)
> > >
> > >Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >Signed-off-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > >index 058aa5ca8b73..6a45df9dad9c 100644
> > >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > >@@ -8869,6 +8869,7 @@ enum {
> > > #define GEN9_SAGV_DISABLE 0x0
> > > #define GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED 0x1
> > > #define GEN9_SAGV_ENABLE 0x3
> > >+#define GEN12_PCODE_READ_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME_US 0x23
> > > #define GEN6_PCODE_DATA _MMIO(0x138128)
> > > #define GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_IA_RATIO_SHIFT 8
> > > #define GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_RING_RATIO_SHIFT 16
> > >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > >index b413a7f3bc5d..13721ba44013 100644
> > >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > >@@ -3645,7 +3645,20 @@ intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > static void
> > > skl_setup_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > > {
> > >- if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) {
> > >+ if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> >
> > sagv will still never be enabled for TGL. Are you going to revert
> > 8ffa4392a32e ("drm/i915/tgl: disable SAGV temporarily")
> > in a separete patch?
>
> Yes, that's the idea - we land these two patches, then once HSD
> 1409542895 gets resolved, we revert 8ffa4392a32e and everything Just
> Works. ;)
The whole sagv stuff is wrong for icl+. Stan is attempting to remedy
that.
>
> -James
>
> >
> > Lucas De Marchi
> >
> > >+ u32 val = 0;
> > >+ int ret;
> > >+
> > >+ ret = sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv,
> > >+ GEN12_PCODE_READ_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME_US,
> > >+ &val, NULL);
> > >+ if (!ret) {
> > >+ dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = val;
> > >+ return;
> > >+ }
> > >+
> > >+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Couldn't read SAGV block time!\n");
> > >+ } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) {
> > > dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = 10;
> > > return;
> > > } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 10)) {
> > >--
> > >2.22.1
> > >
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
