Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/tgl: Read SAGV block time from PCODE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:55:46PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 03:24:27PM -0700, James Ausmus wrote:
> >Starting from TGL, we now need to read the SAGV block time via a PCODE
> >mailbox, rather than having a static value.
> >
> >BSpec: 49326
> >
> >v2: Fix up pcode val data type (Ville), tighten variable scope (Ville)
> >
> >Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Signed-off-by: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |  1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >index 058aa5ca8b73..6a45df9dad9c 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> >@@ -8869,6 +8869,7 @@ enum {
> > #define     GEN9_SAGV_DISABLE			0x0
> > #define     GEN9_SAGV_IS_DISABLED		0x1
> > #define     GEN9_SAGV_ENABLE			0x3
> >+#define GEN12_PCODE_READ_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME_US	0x23
> > #define GEN6_PCODE_DATA				_MMIO(0x138128)
> > #define   GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_IA_RATIO_SHIFT	8
> > #define   GEN6_PCODE_FREQ_RING_RATIO_SHIFT	16
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >index b413a7f3bc5d..13721ba44013 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> >@@ -3645,7 +3645,20 @@ intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > static void
> > skl_setup_sagv_block_time(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > {
> >-	if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) {
> >+	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12) {
> 
> sagv will still never be enabled for TGL. Are you going to revert 
> 8ffa4392a32e ("drm/i915/tgl: disable SAGV temporarily")
> in a separete patch?

Yes, that's the idea - we land these two patches, then once HSD
1409542895 gets resolved, we revert 8ffa4392a32e and everything Just
Works. ;)

-James

> 
> Lucas De Marchi
> 
> >+		u32 val = 0;
> >+		int ret;
> >+
> >+		ret = sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv,
> >+					     GEN12_PCODE_READ_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME_US,
> >+					     &val, NULL);
> >+		if (!ret) {
> >+			dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = val;
> >+			return;
> >+		}
> >+
> >+		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Couldn't read SAGV block time!\n");
> >+	} else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 11)) {
> > 		dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us = 10;
> > 		return;
> > 	} else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 10)) {
> >-- 
> >2.22.1
> >
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux