Quoting Matthew Auld (2019-10-04 18:04:49) > From: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx> > > HWS placement restrictions can't just rely on HAS_LLC flag. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c > index 80fd072ac719..f6799ef9915a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c > @@ -513,7 +513,8 @@ static int pin_ggtt_status_page(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, > unsigned int flags; > > flags = PIN_GLOBAL; > - if (!HAS_LLC(engine->i915)) > + if (!HAS_LLC(engine->i915) && > + i915_ggtt_has_aperture(&engine->i915->ggtt)) engine->gt->ggtt is the preferred abstracted route. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
