Op 04-10-2019 om 15:31 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 01:34:59PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> We are still looking at drm_crtc_state in a few places, convert those
>> to use intel_crtc_state instead. Look at uapi/hw where appropriate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 +++++++-------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 4 ++--
>> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index f555ff6b1f6a..fcd295ed80ed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -16126,8 +16126,8 @@ static int intel_initial_commit(struct drm_device *dev)
>> {
>> struct drm_atomic_state *state = NULL;
>> struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
>> - struct drm_crtc *crtc;
>> - struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
>> + struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> I'd prefer to lift most of this patch to before we do that state split
> so it can be pushed out of the way.
If you apply
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2019-September/214268.html
and I put this before the hw split patch, do I get your r-b up to [PATCH 12/24] drm/i915: Split plane hw and uapi state ?
~Maarten
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
