Re: [PATCH 10/23] drm/i915/dp: Allow big joiner modes in intel_dp_mode_valid()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Op 26-09-2019 om 00:09 schreef Manasi Navare:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 10:30:39PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 01:42:22PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>>> Small changes to intel_dp_mode_valid(), allow listing modes that
>>> can only be supported in the bigjoiner configuration, which is
>>> not supported yet.
>>>
>>> Also unexport a few functions only used internally in intel_dp.c
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++------
>>>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>> index 2fceb71f7f70..046e1662d1e3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
>>> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ intel_dp_max_data_rate(int max_link_clock, int max_lanes)
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static int
>>> -intel_dp_downstream_max_dotclock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>> +intel_dp_downstream_max_dotclock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool allow_bigjoiner)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
>>>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder = &intel_dig_port->base;
>>> @@ -257,6 +257,9 @@ intel_dp_downstream_max_dotclock(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>>  
>>>  	int type = intel_dp->downstream_ports[0] & DP_DS_PORT_TYPE_MASK;
>>>  
>>> +	if (allow_bigjoiner && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
>>> +		max_dotclk *= 2;
>>> +
> Since here we allow the big joiner for >=11 (ICL+), we need to update the
> plane_mode_valid check to ensure that we allow the 8K mode only for TGL+
> else with big joiner enabled on ICL we will enable it on ICL which is not permitted (not POR)

Should we decrease hdisplay_max to 5120 then for < gen12?

intel_mode_valid() currently allows the full mode.

>
>
>> Should we be checking if the specific pipe can do big joiner on the
>> platform (gen11 vs gen12 differences) and also omitting eDP from
>> consideration?
>>
>>
>>>  	if (type != DP_DS_PORT_TYPE_VGA)
>>>  		return max_dotclk;
>>>  
>>> @@ -505,8 +508,10 @@ u32 intel_dp_fec_to_mode_clock(u32 fec_clock)
>>>  		       1000000U);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>> -				       u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay)
>>> +static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>>> +				       u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>> +				       u32 mode_clock, u32 mode_hdisplay,
>>> +				       bool bigjoiner)
>>>  {
>>>  	u32 bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram;
>>>  	int i;
>>> @@ -523,6 +528,10 @@ static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>>  
>>>  	/* Small Joiner Check: output bpp <= joiner RAM (bits) / Horiz. width */
>>>  	max_bpp_small_joiner_ram = DP_DSC_MAX_SMALL_JOINER_RAM_BUFFER / mode_hdisplay;
>>> +
>>> +	if (bigjoiner)
>>> +		max_bpp_small_joiner_ram *= 2;
>>> +
>> This change is correct, but while confirming in the bspec I noticed that
>> we may have the wrong DP_DSC_MAX_SMALL_JOINER_RAM_BUFFER value for
>> gen11+.  It indicates 6144 for GLK, CNL, but 7680 for ICL+ (and double
>> that to 15360 when using big joiner).
>>
>> Bspec: 20388
>> Bspec: 49259
> @Matt, the 7680 is in bytes which translates to 61440 bits and thats what
> we are using, see the #DP_DSC_MAX_SMALL_JOINER_RAM_BUFFER
>
> and then its double for big joiner, so this is correct
>
>>>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Max small joiner bpp: %u\n", max_bpp_small_joiner_ram);
>>>  
>>>  	/*
>>> @@ -531,6 +540,15 @@ static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>>  	 */
>>>  	bits_per_pixel = min(bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_small_joiner_ram);
>>>  
>>> +	if (bigjoiner) {
>>> +		u32 max_bpp_bigjoiner =
>>> +			dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq * 48 /
>>> +			intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock);
>> Minor nitpick, but just to match the bspec (PPC * CDCLK * 24 bits /
>> pixel clock), I'd keep the 2 PPC and 24 bit factors separate here.
>>
> Yes I agree her with Matt that we shd keep the 2ppc separate just to match bspec
>  
>>> +
>>> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Max big joiner bpp: %u\n", max_bpp_bigjoiner);
>>> +		bits_per_pixel = min(bits_per_pixel, max_bpp_bigjoiner);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>  	/* Error out if the max bpp is less than smallest allowed valid bpp */
>>>  	if (bits_per_pixel < valid_dsc_bpp[0]) {
>>>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported BPP %u, min %u\n",
>>> @@ -553,7 +571,8 @@ static u16 intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(u32 link_clock, u32 lane_count,
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>> -				       int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay)
>>> +				       int mode_clock, int mode_hdisplay,
>>> +				       bool bigjoiner)
>>>  {
>>>  	u8 min_slice_count, i;
>>>  	int max_slice_width;
>>> @@ -578,12 +597,20 @@ static u8 intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>>  
>>>  	/* Find the closest match to the valid slice count values */
>>>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(valid_dsc_slicecount); i++) {
>>> -		if (valid_dsc_slicecount[i] >
>>> -		    drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd,
>>> -						    false))
>>> +		u8 test_slice_count = bigjoiner ?
>>> +			2 * valid_dsc_slicecount[i] :
>>> +			valid_dsc_slicecount[i];
>>> +
>>> +		if (test_slice_count >
>>> +		    drm_dp_dsc_sink_max_slice_count(intel_dp->dsc_dpcd, false))
>>>  			break;
>>> -		if (min_slice_count  <= valid_dsc_slicecount[i])
>>> -			return valid_dsc_slicecount[i];
>>> +
>>> +		/* big joiner needs small joiner to be enabled */
>>> +		if (bigjoiner && test_slice_count < 4)
>>> +			continue;
>>> +
>>> +		if (min_slice_count <= test_slice_count)
>>> +			return test_slice_count;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>>  	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Unsupported Slice Count %d\n", min_slice_count);
>>> @@ -603,11 +630,15 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>  	int max_dotclk;
>>>  	u16 dsc_max_output_bpp = 0;
>>>  	u8 dsc_slice_count = 0;
>>> +	bool dsc = false, bigjoiner = false;
>>>  
>>>  	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLSCAN)
>>>  		return MODE_NO_DBLESCAN;
>>>  
>>> -	max_dotclk = intel_dp_downstream_max_dotclock(intel_dp);
>>> +	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK)
>>> +		return MODE_H_ILLEGAL;
>>> +
>>> +	max_dotclk = intel_dp_downstream_max_dotclock(intel_dp, false);
>>>  
>>>  	if (intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp) && fixed_mode) {
>>>  		if (mode->hdisplay > fixed_mode->hdisplay)
>>> @@ -619,6 +650,18 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>  		target_clock = fixed_mode->clock;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> +	if (mode->clock < 10000)
>>> +		return MODE_CLOCK_LOW;
>>> +
>>> +	if (target_clock > max_dotclk) {
>>> +		max_dotclk = intel_dp_downstream_max_dotclock(intel_dp, true);
>>> +
>>> +		if (target_clock > max_dotclk)
>>> +			return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>>> +
>>> +		bigjoiner = true;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>  	max_link_clock = intel_dp_max_link_rate(intel_dp);
>>>  	max_lanes = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp);
>>>  
>>> @@ -639,26 +682,32 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector,
>>>  								true);
>>>  		} else if (drm_dp_sink_supports_fec(intel_dp->fec_capable)) {
>>>  			dsc_max_output_bpp =
>>> -				intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(max_link_clock,
>>> +				intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(dev_priv,
>>> +							    max_link_clock,
>>>  							    max_lanes,
>>>  							    target_clock,
>>> -							    mode->hdisplay) >> 4;
>>> +							    mode->hdisplay,
>>> +							    bigjoiner) >> 4;
>>>  			dsc_slice_count =
>>>  				intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
>>>  							     target_clock,
>>> -							     mode->hdisplay);
>>> +							     mode->hdisplay,
>>> +							     bigjoiner);
>>>  		}
>>> +
>>> +		dsc = dsc_max_output_bpp && dsc_slice_count;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	if ((mode_rate > max_rate && !(dsc_max_output_bpp && dsc_slice_count)) ||
>>> -	    target_clock > max_dotclk)
>>> +	/* big joiner configuration needs DSC */
>>> +	if (bigjoiner && !dsc) {
>>> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Link clock needs bigjoiner, but DSC or FEC not available\n");
>>>  		return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>>> +	}
>> Somewhere in this function we probably also need to make sure that the
>> big joiner is available on the pipe and that we're not using eDP.
>>
> Yes I agree we need to check that we allow big joine only for B and C for ICL and then
> all pipes for TGL+ and not allow for eDP

Yeah, I only allow for mode_valid() to succeed with eDP, will fix that with a check.

bigjoiner is not allowed on pipe A through intel_dp_source_supports_dsc, pipe A -> it didn't need an explicit check.

>> Matt
>>
>>>  
>>> -	if (mode->clock < 10000)
>>> -		return MODE_CLOCK_LOW;
>>> -
>>> -	if (mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_DBLCLK)
>>> -		return MODE_H_ILLEGAL;
>>> +	if (mode_rate > max_rate && !dsc) {
>>> +		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Cannot drive without DSC\n");
>>> +		return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>>> +	}
>>>  
>>>  	return intel_mode_valid_max_plane_size(dev_priv, mode);
>>>  }
>>> @@ -2068,14 +2117,17 @@ static int intel_dp_dsc_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>>  		u8 dsc_dp_slice_count;
>>>  
>>>  		dsc_max_output_bpp =
>>> -			intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(pipe_config->port_clock,
>>> +			intel_dp_dsc_get_output_bpp(dev_priv,
>>> +						    pipe_config->port_clock,
>>>  						    pipe_config->lane_count,
>>>  						    adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>>> -						    adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay);
>>> +						    adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
>>> +						    false);
>>>  		dsc_dp_slice_count =
>>>  			intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(intel_dp,
>>>  						     adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
>>> -						     adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay);
>>> +						     adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
>>> +						     false);
>>>  		if (!dsc_max_output_bpp || !dsc_dp_slice_count) {
>>>  			DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Compressed BPP/Slice Count not supported\n");
>>>  			return -EINVAL;
>>> -- 
>>> 2.20.1
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>>> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>> -- 
>> Matt Roper
>> Graphics Software Engineer
>> VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
>> Intel Corporation
>> (916) 356-2795
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux