On 25/09/2019 11:01, Chris Wilson wrote:
It protects nothing being accessed for the intel_framebuffer, so it's
own locking had better be sufficient.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index d4a7cda60679..5e984ba27bef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1445,11 +1445,6 @@ static int i915_gem_framebuffer_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
struct intel_framebuffer *fbdev_fb = NULL;
struct drm_framebuffer *drm_fb;
- int ret;
-
- ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION
if (dev_priv->fbdev && dev_priv->fbdev->helper.fb) {
@@ -1484,7 +1479,6 @@ static int i915_gem_framebuffer_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
seq_putc(m, '\n');
}
mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.fb_lock);
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
return 0;
}
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
