On Mon, 16 Sep 2019, Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday, 2019-09-16 11:53:24 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Friday, 2019-09-13 14:51:39 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Add helper to check if a drm debug category is enabled. Convert drm core >> >> to use it. No functional changes. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> --- >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c | 2 +- >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 6 +++--- >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 2 +- >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_load.c | 2 +- >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dbi.c | 4 ++-- >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c | 4 ++-- >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 6 +++--- >> >> include/drm/drm_print.h | 5 +++++ >> >> 8 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c >> >> index 5a5b42db6f2a..6576cd997cbd 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_uapi.c >> >> @@ -1406,7 +1406,7 @@ int drm_mode_atomic_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, >> >> } else if (arg->flags & DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_NONBLOCK) { >> >> ret = drm_atomic_nonblocking_commit(state); >> >> } else { >> >> - if (unlikely(drm_debug & DRM_UT_STATE)) >> >> + if (unlikely(drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_STATE))) >> >> drm_atomic_print_state(state); >> >> >> >> ret = drm_atomic_commit(state); >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c >> >> index 97216099a718..f47c5b6b51f7 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c >> >> @@ -1180,7 +1180,7 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb, >> >> } >> >> } >> >> out: >> >> - if (unlikely(ret == -EIO && drm_debug & DRM_UT_DP)) { >> >> + if (unlikely(ret == -EIO && drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DP))) { >> >> struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer(DBG_PREFIX); >> >> >> >> drm_dp_mst_dump_sideband_msg_tx(&p, txmsg); >> >> @@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ static int process_single_tx_qlock(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, >> >> idx += tosend + 1; >> >> >> >> ret = drm_dp_send_sideband_msg(mgr, up, chunk, idx); >> >> - if (unlikely(ret && drm_debug & DRM_UT_DP)) { >> >> + if (unlikely(ret && drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DP))) { >> >> struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer(DBG_PREFIX); >> >> >> >> drm_printf(&p, "sideband msg failed to send\n"); >> >> @@ -2388,7 +2388,7 @@ static void drm_dp_queue_down_tx(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, >> >> mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock); >> >> list_add_tail(&txmsg->next, &mgr->tx_msg_downq); >> >> >> >> - if (unlikely(drm_debug & DRM_UT_DP)) { >> >> + if (unlikely(drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DP))) { >> >> struct drm_printer p = drm_debug_printer(DBG_PREFIX); >> >> >> >> drm_dp_mst_dump_sideband_msg_tx(&p, txmsg); >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c >> >> index 12c783f4d956..58dad4d24cd4 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c >> >> @@ -1551,7 +1551,7 @@ static void connector_bad_edid(struct drm_connector *connector, >> >> { >> >> int i; >> >> >> >> - if (connector->bad_edid_counter++ && !(drm_debug & DRM_UT_KMS)) >> >> + if (connector->bad_edid_counter++ && !drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_KMS)) >> >> return; >> >> >> >> dev_warn(connector->dev->dev, >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_load.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_load.c >> >> index d38b3b255926..37d8ba3ddb46 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_load.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_load.c >> >> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void *edid_load(struct drm_connector *connector, const char *name, >> >> u8 *edid; >> >> int fwsize, builtin; >> >> int i, valid_extensions = 0; >> >> - bool print_bad_edid = !connector->bad_edid_counter || (drm_debug & DRM_UT_KMS); >> >> + bool print_bad_edid = !connector->bad_edid_counter || drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_KMS); >> >> >> >> builtin = match_string(generic_edid_name, GENERIC_EDIDS, name); >> >> if (builtin >= 0) { >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dbi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dbi.c >> >> index f8154316a3b0..ccfb5b33c5e3 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dbi.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dbi.c >> >> @@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ static int mipi_dbi_spi1e_transfer(struct mipi_dbi *dbi, int dc, >> >> int i, ret; >> >> u8 *dst; >> >> >> >> - if (drm_debug & DRM_UT_DRIVER) >> >> + if (drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DRIVER)) >> >> pr_debug("[drm:%s] dc=%d, max_chunk=%zu, transfers:\n", >> >> __func__, dc, max_chunk); >> >> >> >> @@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ static int mipi_dbi_spi1_transfer(struct mipi_dbi *dbi, int dc, >> >> max_chunk = dbi->tx_buf9_len; >> >> dst16 = dbi->tx_buf9; >> >> >> >> - if (drm_debug & DRM_UT_DRIVER) >> >> + if (drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DRIVER)) >> >> pr_debug("[drm:%s] dc=%d, max_chunk=%zu, transfers:\n", >> >> __func__, dc, max_chunk); >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c >> >> index c9b57012d412..a7c89ec5ff26 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_print.c >> >> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ void drm_dev_dbg(const struct device *dev, unsigned int category, >> >> struct va_format vaf; >> >> va_list args; >> >> >> >> - if (!(drm_debug & category)) >> >> + if (!drm_debug_enabled(category)) >> >> return; >> >> >> >> va_start(args, format); >> >> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ void drm_dbg(unsigned int category, const char *format, ...) >> >> struct va_format vaf; >> >> va_list args; >> >> >> >> - if (!(drm_debug & category)) >> >> + if (!drm_debug_enabled(category)) >> >> return; >> >> >> >> va_start(args, format); >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c >> >> index 9c6899758bc9..4f7962b6427b 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c >> >> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ u64 drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count(struct drm_crtc *crtc) >> >> u64 vblank; >> >> unsigned long flags; >> >> >> >> - WARN_ONCE(drm_debug & DRM_UT_VBL && !dev->driver->get_vblank_timestamp, >> >> + WARN_ONCE(drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_VBL) && !dev->driver->get_vblank_timestamp, >> >> "This function requires support for accurate vblank timestamps."); >> >> >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vblank_time_lock, flags); >> >> @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ bool drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, >> >> */ >> >> *vblank_time = ktime_sub_ns(etime, delta_ns); >> >> >> >> - if ((drm_debug & DRM_UT_VBL) == 0) >> >> + if (!drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_VBL)) >> >> return true; >> >> >> >> ts_etime = ktime_to_timespec64(etime); >> >> @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ void drm_vblank_restore(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe) >> >> assert_spin_locked(&dev->vblank_time_lock); >> >> >> >> vblank = &dev->vblank[pipe]; >> >> - WARN_ONCE((drm_debug & DRM_UT_VBL) && !vblank->framedur_ns, >> >> + WARN_ONCE(drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_VBL) && !vblank->framedur_ns, >> >> "Cannot compute missed vblanks without frame duration\n"); >> >> framedur_ns = vblank->framedur_ns; >> >> >> >> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_print.h b/include/drm/drm_print.h >> >> index e5c421abce48..e13f901312a4 100644 >> >> --- a/include/drm/drm_print.h >> >> +++ b/include/drm/drm_print.h >> >> @@ -294,6 +294,11 @@ static inline struct drm_printer drm_err_printer(const char *prefix) >> >> #define DRM_UT_LEASE 0x80 >> >> #define DRM_UT_DP 0x100 >> >> >> >> +static inline bool drm_debug_enabled(unsigned int category) >> >> +{ >> >> + return drm_debug & category; >> > >> > Worth making that `return unlikely(drm_debug & category);` to make sure >> > the preloaded path is always to skip the debug stuff? >> >> If that would let us drop the unlikely() wrapping from the various users >> of this function, agreed, it would be great. >> >> However I'm not at all certain unlikely() here will propagate like >> that. I just don't know. Do you? > > I don't know either, but I expect it would? > Otherwise, this definitely would: > #define drm_debug_enabled(cat) unlikely(drm_debug & category) > > And yeah, dropping the unlikely() sprinkled around some drm_debug_enabled() > calls is a definite bonus. With either of the approaches, would it be okay to change call sites like this: - if (unlikely(ret && drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DP))) { + if (ret && drm_debug_enabled(DRM_UT_DP)) { In theory the compiler should be able to conclude that the unlikely covers the whole branch even if ret is short-circuit evaluated. BR, Jani. > >> >> BR, >> Jani. >> >> >> > >> >> +} >> >> + >> >> __printf(3, 4) >> >> void drm_dev_printk(const struct device *dev, const char *level, >> >> const char *format, ...); >> >> -- >> >> 2.20.1 >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> dri-devel mailing list >> >> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel >> > _______________________________________________ >> > dri-devel mailing list >> > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel >> >> -- >> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx