Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915/gt: Remove presumption of RCS0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2019-07-08 at 22:16 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Summers, Stuart (2019-07-08 22:11:15)
> > On Fri, 2019-07-05 at 13:43 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > We now track features correctly instead of probing i915-
> > > >engine[RCS0]
> > > which is much more flexible and avoids any nasty surprises.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 6 ------
> > >  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> > > index df5932f5f578..bdf279fa3b2e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
> > > @@ -448,12 +448,6 @@ int intel_engines_init_mmio(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *i915)
> > >       if (WARN_ON(mask != engine_mask))
> > >               device_info->engine_mask = mask;
> > >  
> > > -     /* We always presume we have at least RCS available for
> > > later
> > > probing */
> > > -     if (WARN_ON(!HAS_ENGINE(i915, RCS0))) {
> > > -             err = -ENODEV;
> > > -             goto cleanup;
> > > -     }
> > > -
> > 
> > Just going by the series here, we have quite a few other place we
> > are
> > touching RCS0 specifically during driver load. Do we really want to
> > get
> > rid of this? Or is there an alternative if RCS0 isn't present for
> > some
> > reason?
> 
> Outside of gvt/ (which I don't dare to try and verify), the only
> places
> where we now mention RCS0 are in direct hw mappings to that engine
> (e.g. interrupts and mmio setup). [Excluding selftests/ which are
> mostly
> converted and really just a matter of generalising if applicable or
> marking as "no really, this only applies to RCS0".] Assuming the
> other
> couple of patches also land.

Worst case, we don't have any platforms without RCS0, so getting rid of
this shouldn't cause harm. We can always work through issues if we ever
have a platform without this for some reason.

Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Stuart

> -Chris

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux