Quoting Matt Roper (2019-06-25 16:26:48) > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 03:17:39PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:37:49PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote: > > > EHL can have up to one VECS(video enhancement) engine, so add it to > > > the device_info. > > > > Bspec 29150 has a footnote on VEbox that indicates "Pass-through only, > > no VEbox processing logic." That note seems a bit vague, but I think I > > saw some more detailed info in the past somewhere that indicated the > > VECS command streamer is still technically present but doesn't actually > > do any video enhancement on EHL; it just passes content through to SFC. > > > > I'm not terribly plugged into the media side of the world, so I'm not > > sure if we want to expose VECS to userspace if it's basically a noop and > > doesn't do what it normally does on other platforms. Bspec page 5229 > > implies that SFC can be fed directly by the decode engine without going > > through VEBOX, so I'm not sure if media userspace would ever have a use > > for the passthrough-only VECS streamer. > > > > We should probably ask someone on the media team what their thoughts are > > on this. > > Since the media team confirmed that there is indeed a use case for a > passthrough-only VECS, If the CS exists as a separate entity sure... Any chance we can get an ehl into CI to actually confirm this? -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
