On 13/06/2019 15:08, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-06-13 14:35:31)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Having made start to better code compartmentalization by introducing
struct intel_gt, continue the theme elsewhere in code by making functions
take parameters take what logically makes most sense for them instead of
the global struct drm_i915_private.
So I am debating whether this is better off as part of i915_ggtt and not
i915_address_space.
In terms of what object is passed in?
They mostly operate on but, but end with ggtt->invalidate(ggtt). And
while we could move that vfunc to vm (and have it NULL for !ggtt) would
it make sense?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
