Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-17 12:51:06)
>
> On 17/05/2019 12:39, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Tvrtko,
> >
> >> +static int
> >> +__i915_query(int i915, struct drm_i915_query *q)
> >> +{
> >> + if (igt_ioctl(i915, DRM_IOCTL_I915_QUERY, q))
> >> + return -errno;
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int
> >> +__i915_query_items(int i915, struct drm_i915_query_item *items, uint32_t n_items)
> >> +{
> >> + struct drm_i915_query q = {
> >> + .num_items = n_items,
> >> + .items_ptr = to_user_pointer(items),
> >> + };
> >> + return __i915_query(i915, &q);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void
> >> +i915_query_items(int i915, struct drm_i915_query_item *items, uint32_t n_items)
> >> +{
> >> + igt_assert_eq(__i915_query_items(i915, items, n_items), 0);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static bool has_query(int i915)
> >> +{
> >> + struct drm_i915_query query = {};
> >> +
> >> + return __i915_query(i915, &query) == 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static bool has_engine_query(int i915)
> >> +{
> >> + struct drm_i915_query_item item = {
> >> + .query_id = DRM_I915_QUERY_ENGINE_INFO,
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + return __i915_query_items(i915, &item, 1) == 0 && item.length > 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void query_engines(void)
> >> +{
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> + struct drm_i915_query_engine_info *engine_info;
> >> + struct drm_i915_query_item item = {
> >> + .query_id = DRM_I915_QUERY_ENGINE_INFO,
> >> + };
> >> + const unsigned int sz = 4096;
> >> + unsigned int i;
> >> +
> >> + engine_info = malloc(sz);
> >> + igt_assert(engine_info);
> >> + memset(engine_info, 0, sz);
> >> +
> >> + item.data_ptr = to_user_pointer(engine_info);
> >> + item.length = sz;
> >> +
> >> + i915_query_items(fd, &item, 1);
> >> + igt_assert(item.length > 0);
> >> + igt_assert(item.length <= sz);
> >> +
> >> + num = engine_info->num_engines;
> >> +
> >> + engines = calloc(num,
> >> + sizeof(struct i915_engine_class_instance));
> >> + igt_assert(engines);
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> >> + struct drm_i915_engine_info *engine =
> >> + (struct drm_i915_engine_info *)&engine_info->engines[i];
> >> +
> >> + engines[i] = engine->engine;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + __engines = engines;
> >> + __num_engines = num;
> >> +}
> >
> > would it make sense to make a library out of all the above? e.g.
> > gem_engine_topology does similar thing (all static functions like
> > here, though).
>
> Definitely yes, but coordinating all series seems tricky. I think best
> would be to consolidate once everything gets merged?
The challenge is carving out the core into a separate library that
doesn't pull libigt.la in. (Tvrtko has already committed the cardinal sin
of using libigt outside of tests/.) At which point, you have just a
bunch of ioctl wrappers, and fwiw some of us may wish gem_wsim itself
was a scripting engine...
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
