Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 24/25] gem_wsim: Discover engines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 17/05/2019 12:39, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Tvrtko,

+static int
+__i915_query(int i915, struct drm_i915_query *q)
+{
+	if (igt_ioctl(i915, DRM_IOCTL_I915_QUERY, q))
+		return -errno;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+__i915_query_items(int i915, struct drm_i915_query_item *items, uint32_t n_items)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_query q = {
+		.num_items = n_items,
+		.items_ptr = to_user_pointer(items),
+	};
+	return __i915_query(i915, &q);
+}
+
+static void
+i915_query_items(int i915, struct drm_i915_query_item *items, uint32_t n_items)
+{
+	igt_assert_eq(__i915_query_items(i915, items, n_items), 0);
+}
+
+static bool has_query(int i915)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_query query = {};
+
+	return __i915_query(i915, &query) == 0;
+}
+
+static bool has_engine_query(int i915)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_query_item item = {
+		.query_id = DRM_I915_QUERY_ENGINE_INFO,
+	};
+
+	return __i915_query_items(i915, &item, 1) == 0 && item.length > 0;
+}
+
+static void query_engines(void)
+{

[...]

+		struct drm_i915_query_engine_info *engine_info;
+		struct drm_i915_query_item item = {
+			.query_id = DRM_I915_QUERY_ENGINE_INFO,
+		};
+		const unsigned int sz = 4096;
+		unsigned int i;
+
+		engine_info = malloc(sz);
+		igt_assert(engine_info);
+		memset(engine_info, 0, sz);
+
+		item.data_ptr = to_user_pointer(engine_info);
+		item.length = sz;
+
+		i915_query_items(fd, &item, 1);
+		igt_assert(item.length > 0);
+		igt_assert(item.length <= sz);
+
+		num = engine_info->num_engines;
+
+		engines = calloc(num,
+				 sizeof(struct i915_engine_class_instance));
+		igt_assert(engines);
+
+		for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
+			struct drm_i915_engine_info *engine =
+				(struct drm_i915_engine_info *)&engine_info->engines[i];
+
+			engines[i] = engine->engine;
+		}
+	}
+
+	__engines = engines;
+	__num_engines = num;
+}

would it make sense to make a library out of all the above? e.g.
gem_engine_topology does similar thing (all static functions like
here, though).

Definitely yes, but coordinating all series seems tricky. I think best would be to consolidate once everything gets merged?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [AMD Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux