Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2019-04-25 22:50:37) > No functional change. But by making those bits together > we will be able to convert many functions to pass > intel_irq instead of i915_private or uncore. > > For gen8+ "gt_" prefix would be better than pm_ on them > since these regs include more stuff then PM, but let's > keep for legacy reasons. I still disagree with this direction and would like to get the conflicting bug fixes reviewed first. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
