Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-04-10 11:59:23) > There is a chance we can see spurious interrupts in live > now. We have more engines enabled and that with more elaborate > access patterns with pm and display, increases the chances > hardware just makes a social call, without anything to work on. > > Remove the error as we have tests to actually probe if > we really miss interrupt, instead of getting spurious ones. > > Note that now we do write to intr_dw even with a zero > value. This is considered advantegous as the write > is an ack that sw is done. Writing 0 back to 0 handled interrupts seems fair. > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I think both interrupt handling patches should go in first, as they are bug fixes that may be required even before rps is fixed. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
